Descriptive Statistics and Illustrations out of Commonly used Conditions
I checked prospective distinctions of the webpages, geographic part, and you can ethnicity using t-assessment and you can studies away from difference (ANOVA) on the LIWC class percent. Towards one or two websites, half a dozen of your twelve t-evaluation were significant throughout the adopting the groups: first-people only one [t(3998) = ?5.61, p Additional Desk 2 getting function, important deviations, and you will contrasts ranging from ethnic teams). Contrasts found significant differences between White and all other ethnic teams in four of the six tall ANOVAs. Ergo, i included ethnicity as the an effective dummy-coded covariate during the analyses (0 = Light, step one = Virtually any cultural organizations).
Of one’s a dozen ANOVA assessment pertaining to geographical part, only a couple of have been significant (members of the family and you may positive feeling). Because the distinctions weren’t officially important, i failed to consider geographical area into the next analyses.
Results
Regularity away from term use is obvious during the detailed analytics (select Table 1) and you may via term-clouds. The expression-affect method illustrates many popular conditions over the entire test as well as in each of the age groups. The expression-affect system immediately excludes certain terms and conditions, also articles (a great, and, the) and you will prepositions (so you can, that have, on).Подробнее »Descriptive Statistics and Illustrations out of Commonly used Conditions
